Article Sidebar
Evaluating the Group Lending Development at the Vietnam Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development: A Case Study in Bac Giang Branch II
1Institute Faculty of Accounting and Business Management, Vietnam National University of Agriculture
2The Vietnam Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development-Bac Giang Branch II
3Master student, University of Paris Dauphine & ESCP Europe
Main Article Content
Abstract
Group-based lending is a form of loan provision for individuals and households in rural areas for production and consumption purposes. Proceeding from the imbalance between demand and supply on small-scale capital, and also Government policies on sustainable poverty reduction, the Vietnam Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (Agribank) has coordinated with its local authorities and socio-political organizations to provide loan services via group lending. The purpose of this paper was to evaluate the status of group lending development of the Agribank-Bac Giang Branch II. The paper used secondary data collected from the branch and primary data gathered from 50 representative customers and 10 credit officers related the group lending of the branch. Data analysis methods consisted of descriptive statistics and comparative analysis, incorporated with the measurements for bank performance and quality. The findings show positive prospects in both the bank and customers for the development of group lending activity and obstacles in the group lending development of the branch. The paper also proposes some solutions for the branch to tackle difficulties and promote the development of group lending in the branch in Bac Giang province.
Article Details
References
-
Agribank (2016). Decision No. 5199/QD-NHNo-HSX issued on December 30, 2016 on the lending regulations for households and individuals via lending groups, linkage groups, mobile lending groups applied in the Agribank system (in Vietnamese).
Agribank (2019). Annual report of Agribank 2018 (in Vietnamese).
Agribank-Bac Giang Branch II (2019). Annual reports (2016, 2017, 2018) of the Agribank- Bac Giang Branch II (in Vietnamese).
Ahlin C. & Suandi M. (2019). A master of experience? Understanding the decline in group lending. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics. 81(6): 1252-1279. DOI: 10.1111/obes.12305.
Armendariz B. & Morduch J. (2007). The Economics of Microfinance. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Dellien H., Burnett J., Gincherman A. & Lynch E. (2005). Product diversification in microfinance: Introducing individual lending. Women’s World Banking Report, New York: 1-36.
De Quidt J., Fetzer T. & Ghatak M. (2018). Commercialization and the decline of joint liability microcredit. Journal of Development Economics. 117: 119-133.
FAO (2005). FAO Forestry Paper 146: Microfinance and forest-based small-scale enterprises. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, ISBN 92-5-105412-6, 88p.
Ghatak M. (2000). Screening by the company you keep: Joint liability lending and the peer selection effect. Economic Journal. 110(465): 601-631.
Godquin M. (2004). Microfinance repayment performance in Bangladesh: How to improve the allocation of loans by MFIs. World Development. 32: 1909-1926.
Hoang Cong Gia Khanh, Nguyen Thi Canh, Le Ho An Chau, Nguyen Thanh Liem, Hoang Trung Nghia, Dao Thi Ngoc, Nguyen Ton Nhan, Nguyen Anh Phong, Nguyen Thi Dan Que, Pham Phu Quoc, Tran Hung Son, Nguyen Hong Thang, Nguyen Dinh Thien, Tran Quang Van & Pham Thi Thanh Xuan (2018). Annual report 2017 on financial market: Access to finance. Ho Chi Minh City National University Publishing House, 162p (in Vietnamese).
Ledgerwood J. (1999). Microfinance Handbook: An Institutional and Financial Perspective (Sustainable Banking with the poor). The World Bank, Washington, D.C., ISBN 0-8213-4306-8, 262p.
Mabwe K. & Robert W. (2010). A financial ratio analysis of commercial bank performance in South Africa. African Review of Economics and Finance. 2(1): 30-53.
Madajewicz M. (2011). Joint liability versus individual liability in credit contracts. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 77: 107-123.
Maria L. (2009). Group lending versus individual lending in microfinance. Discussion paper No. 299. University of Munich.
Nguyen Tho Anh & Tran Dinh Thao (2017). Evaluating the impact of village savings and loans model on living conditions of rural women: A case study in Quang Binh and Quang Tri province. Vietnam Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 15(9): 1309-1321 (in Vietnamese).
Nunnally J. C. & Bernstein I. H. (1994). The assessment of reliability. Psychometric Theory. 3: 248-292.
Odongo K. & Lilian G. K. (2013). Individual lending versus group lending: An evaluation with Kenya’s microfinance data. Review of Development Finance. 3: 99-108.
Robin B., Annie H. & Dyson M. (2002). Can commercial banks do microfinance? Lessons from the Commercial Bank of Zimbabwe and Co-operative Bank of Kenya. Small Enterprise Development Journal. 13(4): 35-46.
Savita S. (2007). Transaction costs in group microcredit in India. Management Decisions. 45: 1331-1342.
Vietnamese Government (2005). The Decree No.28/2005/ND-CP, issued on March 9, 2005 on organization and operation of microfinance institutions in Vietnam (in Vietnamese).
Vietnamese Government (2015). Decree No. 55/2015/ND-CP and Decree No.116/2018/ND-CP on amending some articles of Decree No. 55/2015/ND-CP on credit policy in agriculture and rural development (in Vietnamese).
World Bank (2013). CGAP Annual report 2013: Advancing financial inclusion to improve the lives of the poor (English). The World Bank, Washington, D.C., 52p.