The Framework of Ecosystem Services for Economic Valuation Purposes: A Review

Date Received: Dec 25, 2018

Date Published: Dec 24, 2019

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31817/vjas.2019.2.3.04

Views

2590

Download

679

How to Cite:

Duc, N. (2019). The Framework of Ecosystem Services for Economic Valuation Purposes: A Review. Vietnam Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2(3), 434–449. https://doi.org/10.31817/vjas.2019.2.3.04

The Framework of Ecosystem Services for Economic Valuation Purposes: A Review

Nguyen Minh Duc (*) 1

  • Corresponding author: nmduc@vnua.edu.vn
  • 1 Faculty of Economics and Rural Development, Vietnam National University of Agriculture, Hanoi 131000, Vietnam

    • Keywords

    Ecosystem service, ecosystem function, ecosystem benefit, ecosystem value

    Abstract


    Although humans need ecosystems and ecosystem services for their survival and well-being, most of the global ecosystems and the services that they provide have declined and/or degraded rapidly over the past few decades. In order to find the ways to sustainably use natural resources, substantial efforts have been made to measure and value the ecosystem services. The term ‘ecosystem service’ was interpreted in different ways in the literature. For making correct decisions in natural resource management, a consistent way of defining and classifying ecosystem services is needed for valuation purposes. This paper argued for the need to divide ecosystem services into intermediate and final services.

    References

    Balmford A., Bruner A., Cooper P., Costanza R., Farber S., Green R. E., Jenkins M., Jefferiss P., Jessamy V. & Madden J. (2002). Economic reasons for conserving wild nature. science. 297(5583): 950-953.

    Bateman I. J., Harwood A. R., Mace G. M., Watson R. T., Abson D. J., Andrews B., Binner A., Crowe A., Day B. H. & Dugdale S. (2013). Bringing ecosystem services into economic decision-making: land use in the United Kingdom. science. 341(6141): 45-50.

    Bateman I. J., Mace G. M., Fezzi C., Atkinson G. & Turner K. (2011). Economic analysis for ecosystem service assessments. Environmental and resource economics. 48(2): 177-218.

    Boyd J. & Banzhaf S. (2007). What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecological Economics. 63(2-3): 616-626.

    Costanza R. (2008). Ecosystem services: multiple classification systems are needed. Biological conservation. 141(2): 350-352.

    Costanza R., d'Arge R., De Groot R., Farber S., Grasso M., Hannon B., Limburg K., Naeem S., O'neill R. V. & Paruelo J. (1997). The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. nature. 387(6630): 253- 260.

    Costanza R., de Groot R., Sutton P., van der Ploeg S., Anderson S. J., Kubiszewski I., Farber S. & Turner R. K. (2014). Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change. 26: 152-158.

    Daily G. C. (1997). Nature's services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems: Island Press.

    De Groot R., Brander L., van der Ploeg S., Costanza R., Bernard F., Braat L., Christie M., Crossman N., Ghermandi A., Hein L., Hussain S., Kumar P., McVittie A., Portela R., Rodriguez L. C., ten Brink P. & van Beukering P. (2012). Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units. Ecosystem Services. 1(1): 50-61.

    De Groot R. S., Alkemade R., Braat L., Hein L. & Willemen, L. (2010). Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecological Complexity. 7(3): 260-272.

    De Groot R. S., Wilson M. A. & Boumans R. M. J. (2002). A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics. 41(3): 393-408.

    Fisher B., Turner K., Zylstra M., Brouwer R., Groot R., Farber S., Ferraro P., Green R., Hadley D. & Harlow J. (2008). Ecosystem services and economic theory: integration for policy-relevant research. Ecological Applications. 18(8): 2050-2067.

    Fisher B., Turner R. K. & Morling P. (2009). Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecological Economics. 68(3): 643-653.

    Fu B. J., Su C. H., Wei Y. P., Willett I. R., Lü Y. H. & Liu G. H. (2011). Double counting in ecosystem services valuation: causes and countermeasures. Ecological research. 26(1): 1-14.

    Haines-Young R. & Potschin M. (2010). The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human wellbeing. D. Raffaelli/C. Frid (Hg.) Ecosystem Ecology: a new synthesis. BES Ecological Reviews Series. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (iE).

    Hein L., Van Koppen K., De Groot R. S. & Van Ierland E. C. (2006). Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecological Economics. 57(2): 209-228.

    Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis (Vol. 1): Island Press Washington, DC.

    Nguyen M. D., Ancev T. & Randall A. (2018). Forest governance andeconomic values of forest ecosystem services in Vietnam. Land Use Policy.

    Nguyen M. D. & Do T. T. H. (2011). Theoretical and empirical issues of applying contingent valuation methods (CVM) on economic valuation of environmental projects in Vietnam. Journal of Economics and Development. 170: 54-59 (in Vietnamese).

    Pascual U., Muradian R., Brander L., Gómez-Baggethun E., Martín-López B., Verma M., Armsworth P., Christie M., Cornelissen H. & Eppink F. (2010). The economics of valuing ecosystem services and

    biodiversity. TEEB–Ecological and Economic Foundation.

    Pearce D. W. (2001). The economic value of forest ecosystems. Ecosystem Health. 7(4): 284-296.

    Postel S. L. & Thompson B. H. (2005). Watershed protection: Capturing the benefits of nature's water supply services. Paper presented at the Natural Resources Forum.

    Potschin M. & Haines-Young R. (Writers). (2018). Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES) V5.1: Guidance on the Application of the Revised Structure.

    Potschin M. B. & Haines-Young R. H. (2011). Ecosystem services: exploring a geographical perspective. Progress in physical geography. 35(5): 575-594.

    Potschin M. B. & Haines-Young R. H. (2016). Defining and measuring ecosystem services Routledge Handbook of Ecosystem Services: Routledge. 53-72.

    Sharp R., Tallis H. T., Ricketts T., Guerry A. D., Wood S. A., Chaplin-Kramer R., Nelson E., Ennaanay D. W. S., Olwero N., Vigerstol K., Pennington D., Mendoza G., Aukema J., Foster J., Forrest J., Cameron D. A. K., Lonsdorf E., Kennedy C., Verutes G., Kim C. K., Guannel G., Papenfus M., Toft J., Marsik M., Bernhardt J., Griffin R., Glowinski K., Chaumont N., Perelman A., Lacayo M., Mandle L., Hamel P., Vogl A. L., Rogers L., Bierbower W., Denu D. & Douglass J. (2018). InVEST 3.6.0 User’s Guide. The Natural Capital Project & Stanford University, U. o. M., The Nature Conservancy, and World Wildlife Fund.

    Smith D. M., de Groot D., Bergkamp G. J. J., Water I. & Initiative N. (2006). Pay: Establishing payments for watershed services: IUCN Gland.

    TEEB F. (2010). The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity Ecological and Economic Foundations. Edited by Pushpam Kumar. Earthscan, London and Washington.

    TEEB Synthesis (2010). Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB. L. a. W. Earthscan.

    Turner R. K., Morse‐Jones S. & Fisher B. (2010). Ecosystem valuation: A sequential decision support system and quality assessment issues. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1185(1): 79-101.

    UK NEA (2011). The UK National Ecosystem Assessment: Synthesis of the Key Findings. C. UNEP-WCMC.

    UK NEA (2014). The UK National Ecosystem Assessment Follow on: Synthesis of the Key Findings. L. UNEPWCMC, UK.

    Wallace K. J. (2007). Classification of ecosystem services: Problems and solutions. Biological conservation. 139(3): 235-246.