Effects of Nitrogen Forms on Root System Development, Physiological Traits, and Dry Matter Production of Rice

Thiem Thi Tran 1 and Yamauchi Akira 2

1Vietnam National University of Agriculture, Hanoi 131000, Vietnam
2Graduate School of Bioagricultural Sciences, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan
Received: Aug 20, 2018 /
Revised: Jul 13, 2021 /
Published: Aug 20, 2018

Main Article Content

Full-Text | pdf

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effects of nitrogen forms on root system development (expressed as total root length, nodal root number, nodal root length, and lateral root length), water use, photosynthetic rate, and dry matter production under water deficit (WD) at 20% w/w and continuously waterlogged (CWL) conditions. Rice plants cv. Nipponbare were grown in plastic pots in a vinyl house. Six N forms were applied at the same rate of 360 mg N per pot, and were prepared as follows: N-NH4+ alone (A); N-NH4+ with nitrification inhibitor (A+DCD); N-NO3- alone (N); N-NO3- with nitrification inhibitor (N+DCD); combined N-NH4+ and N-NO3- (AN); and combined N-NH4+ and N-NO3- with nitrification inhibitor (AN+DCD). The nitrification inhibitor, dicyandiamide (DCD) (C2H4N4), was applied at the rate of 100 mg pot-1. The results of the experiment showed that under both WD and CWL conditions, significant increases were seen in the root system development as expressed through total root length, nodal root number, nodal root length, and lateral root length in the N-NO3- treatments with and without DCD compared to the application of N-NH4+ treatments with and without DCD. This led to an increase in water use, and eventually a significant increase in dry matter production. Similarly, the A treatments with and without DCD also significantly increased root system development as compared with the AN and AN+DCD treatments. Furthermore, under both CWL and WD conditions, the positive and notably significant correlations between the total root length and water use, as well as between the total root length and shoot dry weight, were found only in the A and A+DCD treatments. These results indicate that rice prefers sole ammonium over the mixed ammonium-nitrate treatment, and sole nitrate applications under both WD and CWL conditions.

Keywords: Ammonium, continuously waterlogged, nitrate, rice, root system development, water deficit

Article Details

How to Cite
Tran, T., & Akira, Y. (2018). Effects of Nitrogen Forms on Root System Development, Physiological Traits, and Dry Matter Production of Rice. Vietnam Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 1(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.31817/vjas.2018.1.1.01

References

    1. Duan Y. H., Zhang Y. L., Shen Q. R. and Wang S. W. (2006). Nitrate effect on rice growth and nitrogen absorption and assimilation at different growth stages. Pedosphere. Vol 16. pp. 707-717.
    2. Gao Y., Li Y., Yang X., Li H., Shen Q. and Guo S. (2010). Ammonium nutrition increases water absorption in rice seedlings (Oryza sativa L.) under water stress. Plant and Soil. Vol 331. pp. 193-201.
    3. Guo S. W., Zhou Y., Shen Q. R. and Zhang F. S. (2007a). Effect of ammonium and nitrate nutrition on some physiological processes of higher plants. Plant Biology. Vol 9. pp. 21-29.
    4. Guo S. W., Chen G., Zhou Y. and Shen Q. R. (2007b). Ammonium nutrition increases photosynthesis rate under water stress at early development stage of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant and Soil. Vol 296. pp. 115-124.
    5. Guo S. W., Zhou Y., Li Y., Gao Y. X. and Shen Q. R. (2008). Effect of different nitrogen form and water stress on water use efficiency of rice plants. Annals of Applied Biology. Vol 153. pp. 127-134.
    6. IRRI (International Rice Research Institute) (1997). Rice Almanac. 2nd ed. IRRI with Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical and West Africa Rice Development Association, Manila, Philippines.
    7. IRRI (2009). CROPSTAT Version 7.2. Metro Manila: International Rice Research Institute. Retrieved on June 18, 2017 at http://archive.irri.org/science/soft ware/cropstat.asp.
    8. Jagrati S. (2007). The role of inhibitors in mitigating nitrogen losses from cattle urine and nitrogen fertiliser inputs in pastures. Thesis of doctor in Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand. 267 pages.
    9. Kamoshita A., Wade L. J. and Yamauchi A. (2000). Genotypic variation in response of rainfed lowland rice to drought and rewatering. III. Water extraction during the drought period. Plant Production Science. Vol 3. pp. 189-196.
    10. Kano-Nakata M., Inukai Y., Wade L. J., Siopongco J. D. L. C. and Yamauchi A. (2011). Root development and water uptake, and shoot dry matter production under water deficit conditions in two CSSLs of rice: functional roles of root plasticity. Plant Production Science. Vol 14. pp. 307-317.
    11. Li Y., Gao Y., Ding L., Shen Q. and Guo S. (2009). Ammonium enhances the tolerance of rice seedlings (Oryza sativa L.) to drought conditions. Agricultural Water Management. Vol 96. pp. 1746-1750.
    12. Niones J. M., Suralta R. R., Inukai Y. and Yamauchi A. (2012). Field evaluation functional roles of root plastic responses on dry matter production and grain yield of rice under cycles of transient soil moisture stresses using chromosome segment substitution lines. Plant and Soil. Vol 359. pp. 107-120.
    13. Song W., Makeen K., Wang D., Zhang C., Xu Y., Zhao H., Tu E., Zhang Y., Shen Q. and Xu G. (2011). Nitrate supply affects root growth differentially in two rice cultivars differing in nitrogen use efficiency. Plant and Soil. Vol 343. pp. 357-368.
    14. Thiem T. T., Kano-Nakata M., Suralta R. R., Menge D., Mitsuya S., Inukai Y. and Yamauchi A. (2015). Root plasticity and its functional roles were triggered by water deficit but not by the resulting changes in the forms of soil N in rice. Plant and Soil. Vol 386. pp. 65-76.
    15. Thiem T. T. and Yamauchi A. (2017). Nitrogen application levels affect root system development of rice under water deficit conditions. Vietnam Journal of Agricultural Science. Vol 15 (3) pp. 181-188.
    16. Wade L. J., Sarkarung S., McLaren C. G., Guhey A., Quader B., Boonwite C., Amarante S. T., Sarawgi A. K., Haque A., Harnpichitvitaya D., Pamplona A. and Bhamri M. C. (1995). Genotype x environment interaction and selection methods for identifying improved rainfed lowland rice genotypes. Fragile Lives in Fragile Ecosystems, Proceedings of the International Rice Research Conference, February 13-17, 1995, International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, Philippines. pp. 885-900.
    17. Wang M. Y., Siddeqi M. Y., Ruth T. J. and Glass A. D. M. (1993). Ammonium uptake by rice roots: II. Kinetics of 13NH4+ influx across the plasmalemma. Plant Physiology. Vol 103. pp. 1259-1267.
    18. Yamauchi A., Kono Y. and Tatsumi J. (1988). Comparative growth analysis of upland rice and maize grown under different soil moisture conditions. Japanese Journal of Crop Sciece. Vol 57. pp. 174-183.
    19. Yang X., Li Y., Ren B., Ding L., Gao C., Shen Q. and Guo S. (2012). Drought-induced root aerenchyma formation restricts water uptake in rice seedlings supplied with nitrate. Plant and Cell Physiology. Vol 53. pp. 495-504.
    20. Yuan F., Ran W. and Shen Q. (2005). The nature of soil nitrification potential approached by liquid incubations. Pedosphere. Vol 15 (3). pp. 379-385.
    21. Zhu Q. (2002). Salt and drought stress signal transduction in plants. Annual Review of Plant Biology. Vol 53. pp. 247-273.