The Roles of Perennial Crop Systems to Rural Households: A Case Study in Dak Lak Province, Central Highlands, Vietnam

Date Received: Feb 14, 2023

Date Published: Sep 29, 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31817/vjas.2023.6.3.07

Views

610

Download

231

Issue: Vol. 6 No. 3 (2023): Vietnam Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Section:

ECONOMICS, SOCIETY AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

How to Cite:

Thuy, P., Hoi, V., Phiet, L., Thang, N., Niem, L., & Lebailly, P. (2023). The Roles of Perennial Crop Systems to Rural Households: A Case Study in Dak Lak Province, Central Highlands, Vietnam. Vietnam Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 6(3), 1893–1904. https://doi.org/10.31817/vjas.2023.6.3.07

The Roles of Perennial Crop Systems to Rural Households: A Case Study in Dak Lak Province, Central Highlands, Vietnam

Phan Thi Thuy (*) 1 , Vo Xuan Hoi 1 , Le The Phiet 1 , Nguyen Ngoc Thang 1 , Le Duc Niem 1   , Lebailly Philippe 2

  • Corresponding author: ptthuy@ttn.edu.vn
  • 1 Faculty of Economics, Tay Nguyen University, Buon Ma Thuot 63100, Viet Nam
  • 2 Economics and Rural Development Department, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, Gembloux 5030, Belgium

    • Keywords

    Agroforestry, multistrata agroforestry, livelihoods, Dak Lak province, Vietnam

    Abstract


    This study investigated the role of perennial crop systems in enhancing sustainable livelihoods among rural households in Dak Lak province, Vietnam, with a particular focus on coffee and pepper crops. To gather data for this study, structured interviews were conducted with 86 households (90 farms) through a multi-stage sampling approach from January to May 2019. Moreover, the effectiveness of two agroforestry systems, monoculture and multitrophic agroforestry, was compared. The findings highlighted numerous significant conclusions. First, perennial crop systems contributed significantly to the improvement of rural households' livelihoods through improved monetary income, job creation, the participation of women, and expanded work prospects. Second, intercropping systems were the most economically viable sources of income and less susceptible to market price risk. This conclusions emphasize the importance of farmers and local governments understanding the roles of perennial crops to livelihoods.

    References

    Alcon F., Marín-Miñano C., Zabala J. A., de-Miguel M. D. & Martínez-Paz J. M. (2020). Valuing diversification benefits through intercropping in Mediterranean agroecosystems: A choice experiment approach. Ecological Economics. 171: 106593. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106593.

    Beillouin D., Ben-Ari T. & Makowski D. (2019). Evidence map of crop diversification strategies at the global scale. Environmental Research Letters. 14(12): 123001.

    Brown S. E., Miller D. C., Ordonez P. J. & Baylis K. (2018). Evidence for the impacts of agroforestry on agricultural productivity, ecosystem services, and human well-being in high-income countries: a systematic map protocol. Environmental Evidence. 7: 1-16.

    Cariboni J., Gatelli D., Liska R. & Saltelli A. J. E. M. (2007). The role of sensitivity analysis in ecological modelling. Ecological Modelling. 203(1-2): 167-182.

    Carney D. (2003). Sustainable livelihoods approaches: progress and possibilities for change. London: Department for International Development. 64 pages.

    Carney D. (1998). Sustainable rural livelihoods: What contribution can we make?. London: Department for International Development. 122 pages.

    Chen C., Liu,W., Wu J., Jiang X. & Zhu X. (2019). Can intercropping with the cash crop help improve the soil physico-chemical properties of rubber plantations? Geoderma. 335: 149-160.

    Commission United Nations Statistical. (2016). “Agricultural Cost of Production Statistics: Guidelines for Data Collection, Compilation and Dissemination.” Global Strategy.

    D’haeze D. A. (2020). Transforming coffee and water use in the Central Highlands of Vietnam: case study from Dak Lak province

    DFID (2001). Sustainable livelihoods guidance sheets—Section 2: Framework. Retrieved from https://www.ennonline.net/attachments/871/dfid-sustainable-livelihoods-guidance-sheet-section1.pdfo on September 30, 2022.

    Ellis F. (2000). Rural livelihoods and diversity in developing countries. Oxford University Press.

    FAO (2007). Rural Households ’ Livelihood and Well-Being. Retrieved from https://www.fao.org/3/am085e/am085e00.pdf on September 30, 2022

    FAO (2008). “Water and the Rural Poor.” Retrieved from https://www.fao.org/3/i0132e/i0132e00.htm on September 30, 2022.

    FAO (2016). Agricultural Cost of Production Statistics Guidelines for Data Collection, Compilation and Dissemination. Retrieved from https://www.fao.org/3/ca6411en/ca6411en.pdf on September 30, 2022.

    Feliciano D. (2019). “A Review on the Contribution of Crop Diversification to Sustainable Development Goal 1 ‘No Poverty’ in Different World Regions.” Sustainable Development.

    GSO (2019). Agriculture, hunting, forestry and fishing in 2019. Retrieved from https://www.gso.gov.vn/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Nien-giam-thong-ke-day-du-2019.pdf on November 5, 2022 (in Vietnamese).

    Hunt N. D., Hill J. D. & Liebman M. (2019). Cropping system diversity effects on nutrient discharge, soil erosion, and agronomic performance. Environmental Science and Technology. 53(3): 1344-1352.

    Kalaba F. K., Chirwa P.W. & Prozesky H. (2009). The contribution of indigenous fruit trees in sustaining rural livelihoods and conservation of natural resources. Journal of Horticulture and Forestry. 1(1): 1-6.

    Marino S., Hogue I. B., Ray C. J. & Kirschner D. E. (2008). A methodology for performing global uncertainty and sensitivity analysis in systems biology. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 254 (1): 178-196.

    Mosquera-Losada M. R., Santiago-Freijanes J. J., Rois-Díaz M., Moreno G., den Herder M., Aldrey-Vázquez J. A., Ferreiro-Domínguez N., Pantera A., Pisanelli A. & Rigueiro-Rodríguez A. (2018). Agroforestry in Europe: A land management policy tool to combat climate change. Land Use Policy. 78: 603-613.

    Mulyoutami E., Awalina D., Martini E., Khususiyah N. & Wau D. (2016). Women's participation in agroforestry: more benefit or burden? A gendered analysis of Gorontalo Province. ICRAF Working Paper-World Agroforestry Centre. 226.

    Pham V. T., Mulia R. & Dinh H. T. (2018). Potential mitigation contribution from coffee agroforestry in three regions of Viet Nam. Retrieved from https://cgspace.cgiar.org/handle/10568/98868 on September 30, 2022.

    Salvatore D. & Reagle D. (2002). Statistics and Econometrics, Schaum’s Outline Series. DOI: 10.1036/0071395687.

    Schreckenberg K., Degrande A., Mbosso C., Baboulé Z. B., Boyd C., Enyong L., Kanmegne J. & Ngong C. (2002). The social and economic importance of Dacryodes edulis (G. Don) HJ Lam in Southern Cameroon. Forests, Trees and Livelihoods. 12(1): 15-40.

    Scoones I. (1998). Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: A Framework for Analysis, IDS Working Paper 72, Brighton: IDS.

    Thai H. A. C. (2018). Vulnerability context: A study on livelihood pathways of the Indigenous people. Livelihood Pathways of Indigenous People in Vietnam’s Central Highlands: Exploring Land-Use Change: 1-34. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-71171-3

    UN (2005). Designing Household Survey Samples: Practical Guidelines. United Nations. 98: 264. DOI: 10.18356/f7348051-e.

    Wilson M. H. & Lovell S. T. (2016). Agroforestry—The next step in sustainable and resilient agriculture. Sustainability. 8(6): 574.